- Published: 13 July 2017
- Written by Editor
Callinex Intersects 9.0m of 5.2% Zinc Equivalent Mineralization at 11m Depth Located 350m North of the Nash Creek Deposit in New Brunswick
Table 1: Nash Creek Initial Drill Results
Nash Creek Initial Drill Results(1)(2)(3) |
|||||||
Drill Hole |
From |
To |
Interval |
Zn Eq |
Zn (%) |
Pb (%) |
Ag (g/t) |
NC17-222 |
208.44 |
210.00 |
1.56 |
1.80% |
0.78% |
1.07% |
3.4 |
Including |
208.44 |
208.97 |
0.53 |
3.52% |
0.81% |
2.94% |
6.3 |
NC17-223 |
89.10 |
90.30 |
1.20 |
4.50% |
1.80% |
2.76% |
12.9 |
NC17-224 |
67.00 |
93.37 |
26.37 |
2.48% |
1.71% |
0.27% |
23.2 |
Including |
77.00 |
93.37 |
16.37 |
3.42% |
2.43% |
0.35% |
30.0 |
Including |
77.00 |
91.83 |
14.83 |
3.63% |
2.56% |
0.37% |
32.7 |
Including |
78.65 |
81.30 |
2.65 |
6.89% |
4.79% |
0.87% |
58.6 |
and |
88.58 |
91.00 |
2.42 |
5.62% |
4.68% |
0.45% |
23.5 |
and |
103.75 |
104.63 |
0.88 |
1.54% |
1.34% |
0.16% |
2.6 |
and |
115.33 |
115.97 |
0.64 |
2.55% |
1.36% |
0.98% |
14.8 |
and |
195.16 |
196.16 |
1.00 |
1.55% |
0.70% |
0.81% |
6.5 |
NC17-225 |
No significant results |
||||||
NC17-226 |
11.00 |
20.00 |
9.00 |
5.24% |
3.59% |
1.15% |
28.0 |
Including |
16.86 |
19.30 |
2.44 |
12.64% |
8.96% |
2.65% |
59.2 |
and |
29.00 |
41.00 |
12.00 |
1.78% |
1.40% |
0.19% |
9.3 |
Including |
31.00 |
33.00 |
2.00 |
4.52% |
3.80% |
0.36% |
17.6 |
and |
210.90 |
213.00 |
2.10 |
1.59% |
1.29% |
0.25% |
3.3 |
and |
219.40 |
220.34 |
0.94 |
1.68% |
0.91% |
0.77% |
4.4 |
and |
231.00 |
231.42 |
0.42 |
2.43% |
2.09% |
0.21% |
7.0 |
and |
235.38 |
235.90 |
0.52 |
3.16% |
2.47% |
0.42% |
13.8 |
and |
241.72 |
246.00 |
4.28 |
1.79% |
1.50% |
0.15% |
7.0 |
including |
245.31 |
246.00 |
0.69 |
4.53% |
3.77% |
0.33% |
20.9 |
Note(1)(2(3): |
|
1. |
Zinc equivalent grades are based on the following metal prices: zinc US$2,525/t (1.15/lb), lead US$2,205/t (1.00/lb), and silver US$18.0 per oz. Metal recoveries of 100% were applied in the metal equivalent calculations. The zinc equivalent calculation is as follows: ZnEq = 100 ((Ag Price in (g) x Ag Grade) + (Pb Price*2204.6 x Pb Grade(%)/100) + (Zn Price*2204.6 x (Zn Grade(%)/100))/Zn Price*2204.6). |
2. |
The numbers may not add due to rounding. |
3. |
True widths are not currently known. |
Table 2: 2016 Nash Creek Mineral Resource Estimate
Nash Creek Mineral Resource Estimate |
|||||
Resource |
Tonnes |
Zn. Eq. |
Zn |
Pb |
Ag |
Hickey Zone |
|||||
Indicated |
3,174,000 |
3.09 |
2.38 |
0.53 |
15.8 |
Inferred |
177,000 |
3.09 |
2.24 |
0.68 |
16.7 |
Hayes Zone |
|||||
Indicated |
5,859,000 |
3.84 |
3.01 |
0.59 |
19.4 |
Inferred |
936,000 |
3.67 |
2.95 |
0.55 |
15.3 |
Total |
|||||
Indicated |
9,033,000 |
3.58 |
2.79 |
0.57 |
18.16 |
Inferred |
1,113,000 |
3.58 |
2.83 |
0.57 |
15.51 |
Notes: |
|
1. |
Estimation and reporting of the mineral resource estimate adheres to NI 43-101 guidelines and CIM Definition Standards. |
2. |
Zn. Eq. is calculated using three-year trailing metal prices of $0.90/lb Zn, $0.87/lb Pb and $17.73/oz Ag, and recoveries of 90.5% Zn, 81.5% Pb and 50% Ag based on preliminary results from metallurgical testing. |
3. |
Mineralization was constrained using a 2.00% Zn. Eq. wireframe, and segmented in 16 domains in the Hickey Zone, and 5 domains in the Hayes Zone. The cut-off grade for the mineral resource estimate is 2.00% Zn. Eq. which is considered suitable for reporting mineral resources for a potential open pit project and depth of mineralization. The estimate is not constrained by a conceptual pit. |
4. |
Densities vary by grade and rock type with an average specific gravity of 2.84 for the Hayes Deposit and of 2.82 for the Hickey Deposit. |
5. |
The mineral resource estimate was calculated using an ordinary kriging (OK) methodology. The block model was constructed with block dimensions of 5 x 5 x 5 meters. |
6. |
Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves and have not been demonstrated to have economic viability for extraction. The quantity and grade of reported inferred resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred resources as an indicated or measured mineral resource.It is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an indicated or measured mineral resource category. |
7. |
Numbers may not add exactly due to rounding. |
Table 3: NQ Diamond Drill Hole Data
Hole ID |
UTM Zone 19T NAD 83 East |
UTM Zone 19T NAD 83 North |
Elevation |
Azimuth (o N UTM) |
Dip |
Length |
NC17-222 |
716691 |
5308307 |
73 |
0 |
-90 |
261 |
NC17-223 |
717003 |
5308349 |
49 |
0 |
-90 |
177 |
NC17-224 |
717060 |
5308540 |
52 |
0 |
-90 |
237 |
NC17-225 |
717220 |
5309050 |
39 |
0 |
-90 |
183 |
NC17-226 |
716859 |
5308688 |
59 |
0 |
-90 |
271 |
Figure 1: Map of the Bathurst Mining District of Northern New Brunswick
Figure 2: Plan Map of Nash Creek Drill Holes
Figure 3: Long Section View of the Nash Creek Deposit
Figure 4: Cross Section View of Drill Holes NC17-226, NC05-10 and NC17-224
QA/QC
Individual samples were labeled, placed in plastic sample bags, and sealed. Groups of samples were then placed in security sealed bags and shipped directly to SGS Canada Inc in Vancouver, B.C. for analysis. Samples were crushed to 75% passing 2mm and pulverized to 85% passing 75 microns in order produce a 250g split. All copper, zinc and silver assays were determined by Aqua Regia digestion with a combination of ICP-MS and ICP-AES finish, with overlimits (>100 ppm Ag, >10,000 ppm Zn, and >10,000 ppm Cu) completed by fire assay with gravimetric finish (Ag) or Aqua Regia digestion with ICP-AES finish (copper and zinc). All samples were analyzed for gold by Fire Assay of a 30 gram charge by AAS, or if over 10.0 g/t were re-assayed and completed with a gravimetric finish. QA/QC included the insertion and continual monitoring of numerous standards and blanks into the sample stream at a frequency of 1 per 10 samples, and the collection of duplicate samples at random intervals within each batch at a frequency of 1 per 10 samples.
SGS Canada Inc carried out some or all of following methods to obtain the assay results for Callinex: G_LOG02 Pre-preparation processing, G_WGH79 Weighing and reporting, G_PRP89 Weigh, dry, crush, split, pulverize, G_SCRQC QC for crush and pulverize stages, G_CRU22 Crush >3kg, G_DRY11 Dry samples, GE_FAA313 @Au, FAS, AAS, 30g-5ml (Final mode), GE-IC14A Aqua Regia digestion/ICP-AES finish, GE_IMS14B Aqua Regia digestion/ICP-MS package, GE_IMS14 Aqua Regia digestion, GO_FAG303 30g, Fire assay, gravimetric finish (Au)(Final Mode), GO_FAG313 30g, Fire assay, gravimetric finish (Ag)(Final Mode), G0_ICP13B Ore Grade, Aqua Regia digest/ICP-AES. Ag >10ppm was analyzed by ICP and GO_XRF77B-pyrosulfate fusion.
About Callinex Mines Inc.
Callinex Mines Inc. is focused on discovering and developing zinc and copper rich mines within prolific Canadian VMS mining jurisdictions. The Company is actively exploring its Pine Bay Project, located in the Flin Flon mining district of Manitoba, which hosts significant historic VMS deposits that are within close proximity to a processing facility. The larger project portfolio hosts three significant zinc rich mineral resources including the Point Leamington, Nash Creek and Superjack Projects located in Eastern Canada.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Some statements in this news release contain forward-looking information. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to future expenditures. These statements address future events and conditions and, as such, involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the statements. Such factors include, among others, the ability to complete the proposed drill program and the timing and amount of expenditures. Except as required under applicable securities laws, Callinex does not assume the obligation to update any forward-looking statement.
SOURCE Callinex Mines Inc.
View original content: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/July2017/13/c7940.html
Contact:
Callinex Mines Inc., Max Porterfield, President and Chief Executive Officer, Phone: (604) 605-0885, E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.